The Online Gaming Bill, 2025 which has been recently approved by President bans all real-money online games. The law has forced platforms like Dream11, WinZo, and PokerBaazi to halt their cash play, sending gaming stocks into a tailspin. The bill led to massive losses to many investors who has invested in the online gaming companies like Dream11, Nazara and others.
Following the approval of the bill, Nazara's shares have crashed by 16% in the past one month. The stock prices have come down from rupees 1414 to R 1133. The steep decline in Nazara Technologies shares has resulted in a combined Rs 100 crore mark-to-market loss for ace investors Nikhil Kamath and Madhusudan Kela in just four trading sessions. Madhusudan Kela is an ace investor In the stock market having assets of worth 2700 crore.
But there is an exception. Rekha Jhunjhunwala, The wife of late Rakesh Jhunjhunwala used to be an big investor in Nazara technologies holding 61.8 lakh shares worth 334 crores. But just before the bill was passed in August, she offloaded her entire stake in Nazara Technologies in June. The decision shielded her portfolio from losses of over Rs 334 crore where as other investors reported massive losses.
But the question is how did Rekha Jhunjhunwala know how to sell all the shares at a time when other investors were pumping huge money in the online gaming and real money games space. It may be her business acumen but some other things also need consideration such as a the accusations of insider trading.
Insider trading refers to the buying or selling of a public company's stock or other securities by individuals who have access to material, non-public information (often called "inside information") about the company.
This information is considered "material" if it could significantly influence an investor's decision to buy or sell the security, such as upcoming earnings reports, mergers, product launches, or regulatory approvals that haven't been disclosed to the public yet.
Insider trading is typically illegal when it involves breaching a fiduciary duty or relationship of trust and confidence, giving the trader an unfair advantage over the general public.
However, not all forms are illegal—some "legal" insider trading occurs when company insiders (like executives or directors) trade their own company's stock but properly disclose it to regulators (e.g., via SEC filings in the US) without using confidential info.
These penalties apply to insiders (e.g., directors, employees) and tippees (those receiving UPSI). SEBI's enforcement has strengthened post-2015 regulations, with appeals possible to the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) or courts.
Comments
Write Comment